Prevalence of Aggressive or Violent Behaviour in Thai Patients with Schizophrenia: a Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of violence and factors associated with aggressive or violent behaviour in Thai patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in all patients with schizophrenia aged ≥18 years admitted to Suan Prung Psychiatric Hospital, Thailand, between January and November 2014. Baseline interviews were conducted by a psychiatrist and psychiatric nurses. Accessibility to weapons and toxic chemicals was evaluated. RESULTS: Of 230 patients with schizophrenia screened, 207 (162 men and 45 women) were included. Of them, only 16 (7.7%) patients had aggressive or violent behaviour, including verbal aggression (n = 7), physical aggression (n = 5), and aggression against property (n = 4). Nonetheless, only 2 (12.5%) of them had been charged by the police. The weapon score was higher in violent than non-violent patients (p < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that the weapon score was the only significant predictor of violence. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with schizophrenia with greater access to weapons were more likely to have aggressive or violent behaviour. Routine screening for access to weapons in clinical settings and adequate treatment of psychotic symptoms may reduce the incidence of aggressive or violent behaviour and violent offences.

Quetiapine for schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Quetiapine is an atypical antipsychotic with, theoretically, a low propensity for movement disorder adverse effects. It is used for the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychoses. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of quetiapine for schizophrenia in comparison to placebo, and other antipsychotics. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches of the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register of Trials (February 2003), Biological Abstracts (1982-2000), CINAHL (1982-2000), the Cochrane Library (2000, Issue 1),EMBASE (1980-2000), MEDLINE (1966-2000), PsycLIT (1974-2000), SIGLE on CD (1980-1997), SocioFile (1974-1997) and many conference proceedings and hand searches of specific journals were undertaken. We contacted AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals for information regarding unpublished trials. The review was updated in February 2003. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials where adults with schizophrenia or similar illnesses were assigned to quetiapine, placebo or other neuroleptic drugs and where clinically relevant outcomes were reported. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Citations and, where possible, abstracts were inspected independently by reviewers, papers ordered, re-inspected and quality assessed. We independently extracted data. We analysed data using fixed effects relative risk (RR) and estimated the 95% confidence interval (CI). Only homogeneous data were interpreted as favouring treatment or control. Where possible we calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) or number needed to harm statistics (NNH). We calculated relative risk (RR) for dichotomous data, and weighted mean differences (WMD) for continuous data. MAIN RESULTS: Despite the fact that 3443 people were randomised in 12 quetiapine studies, there are almost no data on service utilisation, economic outcomes, social functioning and quality of life. Over half of those within the quetiapine versus placebo comparison were lost to follow up (53% quetiapine vs 61% placebo, n=716, 4RCTs, RR 0.84 CI 0.7 to 0.9, NNT 11 CI 7 to 55) so it is impossible to interpret any ratings of global or mental state within this comparison with confidence. People allocated quetiapine, however, did not have more movement disorders than those given placebo (n=395, 2 RCTs, RR needing medication for EPSE 0.62 CI 0.3 to 1.2). The same applies to the comparison of >/= 250 mg/day quetiapine with < 250 mg/day quetiapine (49% dropout >/= 250 mg/day vs 58% < 250 mg/day, n=1066, 3 RCTs, RR 0.84 CI 0.8 to 0.9, NNT 11 CI 7 to 29). It should be noted that two deaths occurred in the higher dose group (n=618, 1 RCT, RR 0.1 CI 0.0 to 2.1). When quetiapine was compared with typical antipsychotics, about 36% of both groups failed to complete the short-term studies (n=1624, 6 RCTs, RR 0.87 CI 0.8 to 1.0). Average change in global state was heterogeneous and equivocal (n=762, 3 RCTs, WMD in short term 0.19 CI 0.00 to 0.38, I squared 76%). Mental state measures were also equivocal (n=1247, RR not improved 0.97 CI 0.9 to 1.1) including specific measures of negative symptoms (n=305, 1 RCT, MD change in SANS short term 0.94 CI -0.2 to 2.0). Movement disorders were less prevalent for those allocated quetiapine (n=1117, 4 RCTs, RR needing medication for extrapyramidal adverse effects 0.47 CI 0.4 to 0.6, NNT 4 CI 4 to 5, I squared 88%). Dry mouth (n=649, 2 RCTs, RR short term 2.85 CI 1.5 to 5.6, NNH 17 CI 7 to 65) and sleepiness (n=959, 3 RCTs, RR 1.51 CI 1.1 to 2.2, NNH 18 CI 8 to 181) may also be more prevalent for people given quetiapine compared with the older drugs. In the quetiapine versus risperidone comparison, over 30% of people left the study before completion (n=728, 1 RCT, RR 0.94 CI 0.7 to 1.2). Four people, all treated with quetiapine, died during the study (n=728, 1 RCT, RR 2.86 CI 0.2 to 52.8). Continuous mental state measures did not show clear differences between the two drugs (n=637, 1 RCT, MD PANSS 1.2 CI -2.0 to 4.4). However, considerably fewer people given quetiapine needed medication for extrapyramidal side effects compared with those allocated to risperidone (n=712, 1 RCT, RR 0.27 CI 0.2 to 0.5, NNT 11 CI 10 to 16). Quetiapine caused more dizziness (n=728, 1 RCT, RR 1.85 CI 1.0 to 3.3, NNH 18 CI 7 to 487), more dry mouth (n=728, 1 RCT, RR 2.11 CI 1.2 to 3.8, NNH 14 CI 6 to 82) and more sleepiness than risperidone (n=728, 1 RCT, RR 2.03 CI 1.4 to 2.9, NNH 7 CI 4 to 17). REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: Quetiapine is effective for the treatment of schizophrenia, but it is not much different from first-generation antipsychotics and risperidone with respect to treatment withdrawal and efficacy. In comparison to first-generation antipsychotics and risperidone, quetiapine has a lower risk of movement disorders but higher risks of dizziness, dry mouth and sleepiness. More clearly reported pragmatic randomised controlled trials should be carried out to determine its position in everyday clinical practice. Studies of medium and long-term effects, including cost-effectiveness, quality of life, social functioning and service utilisation, in comparison with the effects of typical and atypical antipsychotics should be priority areas.

Risperidone for controlling aggressive behavior in a mentally retarded child: a case report.

Risperidone is an atypical antipsychotic agent with dopamine and serotonin antagonistic effects. It is an effective treatment for reducing aggressive behavior in adults with mental retardation. The use of risperidone in a severely mental retarded child with aggression is described. Risperidone was able to reduce the aggressive behavior in this patient. No serious side effect was found. This case illustrated that risperidone is effective and well tolerated in treating aggressive behavior in children with severe mental retardation. However, the anti-aggressive effect of risperidone in mentally retarded children remains to be seen in a larger sample-size study.

Evaluation of three simple methods for predicting therapeutic lithium doses.

The bias and accuracy of three simple methods for predicting lithium doses were assessed in this prospective study. In each patient, we computed the predicted doses (PDs) of lithium by applying three formulas. The actual dose (AD), the lowest lithium dose that was enough to produce a serum lithium concentration higher than 0.80 mmol/l, was determined. The PD computed by each formula was then compared with the AD to identify the one with the least bias and the greatest accuracy in predicting therapeutic lithium doses. As mean prediction error (ME) is a convenient measure of bias, the prediction error (PE) of each comparison was computed by subtracting the AD from the PD. Accuracy was assessed as a function of the root-mean-squared prediction error (rMSE). Seventeen psychiatric inpatients participated in this study. The 95% confidence interval of ME of a proposed formula [Zetin, M., Garber, D., De Antonio, M., Schlegel, A., Feureisen, S., Fieve, R., Jewett, C., Reus, V., Huey, L.Y., 1986. Prediction of lithium dose: a mathematic alternative to the test-dose method. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 47, 175-178] was across zero (-15.48 to 133.72). In addition, the rMSE of that formula was also the lowest one (152.66 mg/day). The method proposed by Zetin et al. (1986) is the least biased and the most accurate way to predict therapeutic lithium doses.

Tricyclic antidepressants for depressive disorders in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

The tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are effective for the treatment of adult depression. However, their efficacy of these in the treatment of children and adolescents with depression is equivocal. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the efficacy and acceptability of TCAs in the treatment of depressive disorders in children and adolescents. The databases of MEDLINE (from 1966 to October 1999) and Controlled Clinical Trials Registered (from 1980 to October 1999) were searched for randomized-controlled trials relevant to the use of TCAs for treating depressed children and adolescents. The reviewers also examined the reference lists of identified papers and that of a previous meta-analysis. In each trial, both nonresponse rates and dropout rates were taken into account and extracted on an intention-to-treat basis. The nonresponse-rate and dropout-rate odd ratios (ORs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals (95% CIs) of each trial and the pooled non-response-rate and dropout-rate ORs (95% CIs) of all trials were computed. Nine trials included in this meta-analysis were 2 amitriptyline, 3 desipramine, 2 imipramine, and 2 nortriptyline studies. By using a fixed-effect model, the pooled nonresponse-rate OR (95% CI) and the pooled dropout rate OR (95% CI) of antidepressant-treated group were 0.92 (0.57 to 1.47) and 2.14 (1.12 to 4.09), respectively. In summary, the evidence so far does not support that TCAs are more effective or more acceptable than placebo in the treatment of depressive disorders in children and adolescents. However, the studies of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and newer antidepressants for the treatment of these disorders should be further investigated.

Comparison of the efficacy and acceptability of atypical antipsychotic drugs: a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

Knowing the clinical differences of olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone would be of benefit for choosing an atypical antipsychotic drug. In order to compare their efficacy and acceptability, we conducted a meta-analysis of published, randomized, placebo-controlled trials by comparing the response and dropout rates of an atypical antipsychotic drug group and those of a placebo group. After a comprehensive search of study reports, the response and dropout rates of patients treated with an atypical antipsychotic drug and those treated with placebo were extracted on the intention-to-treat basis. The effect size with 95 per cent confidence interval (CI) of pooled data comparing the response and dropout rates of an atypical antipsychotic drug group and those of a placebo group were calculated by using the Peto method. The response-rate effect sizes (95% CIs) of olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone were 1.75 (1.06 to 2.89), 1.71 (1.20 to 2.42), and 3.28 (1.98 to 5.44), respectively. The dropout-rate effect sizes (95% CIs) of olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone were 0.55 (0.35 to 0.88), 0.65 (0.46 to 0.91), and 0.39 (0.24 to 0.62), respectively. In conclusion, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone are more effective and more acceptable than placebo in treating schizophrenic patients. However, they are not different from each other in the respect of efficacy and acceptability. The cost of these agents should play an important role in choosing an atypical antipsychotic drug.